With the development of blockchain technology, Cross-Chain Bridge has become a key component in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. It allows asset transfers between different blockchains, breaking the limitations of traditional blockchain silos and making cross-chain interactions more convenient. However, the security of this technology has been a major concern for the industry. Today, we'll take a closer look at the current state and risks of cross-link bridges, and help you understand the risks you may face when using cross-link bridges and how to prevent them.
Introduction to Cross Chain Bridge Technology
Cross-chain bridges are a technology that enables the interoperability of assets across different blockchains, often allowing users to transfer assets (e.g., Bitcoin, Ether) from one blockchain to another for trading or investing. The core goal of these bridges is to make the blockchain ecosystem more interconnected and interoperable, improving mobility and ease of use. Currently, more and more projects and platforms are using cross-chain bridges to facilitate asset flows and accelerate the popularity of cryptocurrencies.
Principle of Operation of Crosslink Bridges
The basic principle of operation of cross-chain bridges is to ensure that assets on one blockchain can be "locked" or "hooked" and "mapped" on another blockchain through some mechanism. In this way, users can seamlessly transfer assets between different blockchains. For example, Ether ETH can be converted to TRC20-ETH on the TRON blockchain via bridging technology, and the most common cross-chain bridging technologies include smart contract-based bridges, side-chaining, and relay-chaining technologies.
This technology is not entirely risk-free.
Safety Challenges of Cross-Chain Bridges
The security of cross-link bridges has always been a hot topic in the industry. Although Crosslink Bridges are designed with full consideration of users' needs and provide a convenient way to transfer assets, they are also facing some potential risks. According to surveys and past cases, Crosslink Bridge may have the following risks:
Smart Contract Vulnerability: Since cross-link bridges rely on smart contracts for asset transfers, any vulnerability or error in the contracts can be exploited by hackers, leading to loss of funds. For example, an attack on Poly Network's cross-link bridge in 2021 resulted in the theft of over $600 million.
Trust issues with intermediaries: Some cross-link bridges are managed by centralized third parties, which means that if these organizations are attacked or mismanaged internally, it could pose a threat to user funds.
Inadequate security audits: Some cross-link bridges may not have sufficiently rigorous or transparent security audits, and hackers may be able to attack the pool of funds by discovering vulnerabilities in the system. This is particularly the case with certain emerging platforms or smaller projects.
Real Case Study: Crosslink Bridge Security Vulnerability
Let's take a look at a few real-life examples of cross-link bridge attacks that reveal the seriousness of the cross-link bridge security problem.
Poly Network Attack Incident
Poly Network was the subject of one of the largest cross-link bridge attacks in 2021, in which hackers managed to steal more than $600 million in crypto assets through a contract vulnerability. The incident sparked widespread concern about the security of cross-link bridge smart contracts. Although the hackers eventually returned the funds, the incident dealt a severe blow to the trust of many users of cross-link technology.
Ronin Network Attack
Ronin Network is a blockchain developed by Axie Infinity that is primarily used to support in-game asset transfers. In 2022, the network's cross-link bridge was attacked and hackers managed to steal approximately $625 million. The root cause of the attack was an unprotected private key and multiple signature mechanism vulnerability.
Risk Management and Preventive Measures for Bridges Across Chains
Despite the security risks associated with cross-link bridges, many platforms have taken steps to improve security as the technology continues to mature. Below are some of the industry's risk prevention strategies:
Multiple signatures and decentralized control: To avoid a single point of failure, many cross-link bridges employ multiple signatures and decentralized management, which can greatly reduce the risk of a single point of attack.
Enhanced Smart Contract Audit: Smart contracts across link bridges need to undergo a rigorous security audit and be updated and patched for vulnerabilities on a regular basis. Some leading projects have partnered with specialized security firms to conduct code audits and vulnerability detection.
Real-time monitoring and risk alerts: Some cross-link bridge platforms have introduced real-time monitoring systems, which can instantly detect abnormal transactions and issue alerts, so that they can quickly respond to possible attacks and protect users' funds.
How to choose a safe span bridge
Safety should be one of the most important considerations when choosing a bridge to use. Below are some suggestions for choosing a safe span bridge:
Choose a platform that has undergone multiple security audits: Ensure that the chosen cross-link bridge has undergone a professional security audit and that the results of the audit are made public and transparent.
See community feedback and usage reviews: Find out how other users experience the bridge, especially if there are any historical security incidents or vulnerabilities.
Choose bridges with decentralized management: Decentralized cross-link bridges reduce the risk of a single point of failure and improve overall security.
Frequently Asked Questions Q&A
Q1: Do I need to pay extra handling fee every time I cross the link bridge?
A1：Yes, most cross-link bridges charge a fee, which varies depending on the platform and the blockchain chosen. It is recommended to understand the fee structure before use.
Q2: How do I know if a particular span is safe?
A2: You can check the security audit report of the bridge and inquire whether there have been any public security breaches. Choosing those platforms that have been audited by reputable third-party organizations will be more secure.
Q3: Will my funds be lost if the bridge is attacked?
A3: Not necessarily. Certain platforms have an insurance mechanism that will compensate for loss of funds, or will notify users so that they can take timely action. Choosing a well-known platform with a good reputation can effectively reduce the risk.
In conclusion, cross-link bridge technology has undoubtedly provided great convenience to the cryptocurrency ecosystem, but its security still needs to be carefully evaluated. Understanding and following security best practices and choosing a well-audited platform when using cross-link bridges can effectively minimize risk and safeguard assets.
English 
Chinese